![]() ![]() Those are probably the most likely candidates if you see the need or want that kind of zoom range. Poor detail from having to use high iso settings to counteract the slow shutter So if your budget is tight then take a look at the fz300/330, while it has a small sensor like the other two models you mention it has a reduced zoom range allowing a faster lens so you will have 25-600 f2.8 or the fz1000 with a larger sensor but less zoom range 25-400 f2.8 to f4 which will give you better lowlight performance.Īs for blurry images, there a few things that cause this, your own body movement, poor camera handling, slow shutter speeds, subject movement. If you wish for better image quality then you need to either increase the sensor size, reduce the amount reach from the zoom and use a faster lens. I want to avoid any blurriness with my photos.īoth of these cameras are very poor in lowlight as they have small sensor combined with a long telephoto reach that has what we call a slow variable f stop to keep the camera small. Apparently, some owners/users have experienced getting blurry images when using the 65 x optical zoom. I only photograph occasionally, and I read elsewhere online, that apart from the Canon PowerShot SX70 HS having a small sensor that is poor for using in low light conditions. My dilemma is, out of the: Canon PowerShot SX70 HS, and Panasonic Lumix FZ80, which would be better/more suitable for me? (As I cannot afford a DSLR, or Mirrorless camera.) ![]() As well as taking photos of general tourist attractions - city skylines, coastlines, inland, forests, island sights, dolphins in waterways, other wildlife on land - island reserves or wildlife reserves. I have a trip coming up, involving some photography of very small Australian marsupial wildlife in the bush (woods) that is endangered. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2023
Categories |